MACDILL AIR
FORCE BASE, Fla.-Following
through on a promise, President Bush yesterday elevated U.S.
military ties with Pakistan, granting it benefits enjoyed
by only a handful of countries outside the NATO alliance."
(AP)
Religious ban upheld in Moscow.
Moscow-Reflecting increased pressure
on religious minorities in a country dominated by the Russian
Orthodox Church, a Moscow court upheld a ban on activities
by the Jehovah's Witnesses in the capital." [All these headlines
taken from a June 17 local newspaper. Articles like this are
showing up all the time now.]
105 killed in bomb attacks; strikes appear
coordinated. Masked men target Iraq police. BAGHDAD, Iraq-Fighting
raged in five cities across Iraq yesterday as insurgents carried
out apparently coordinated attacks that killed more than 105
people and wounded hundreds more.
Plums of smoke
boiled up form the streets of Fallujah, Ramadi, Baqouba, Mosul
and Baghdad as masked insurgents battled U.S. troops and Iraqi
security forces in what several officials said could be the
opening salvo in a violent push to derail the June 30 transfer
of sovereignty."(THE NEW YORK TIMES,
25 June 04)
Vital Background information:
The Origin of the Modern Violent Expansion of Islam
"In
1980 [only] two out of 64 [terrorist] groups [could be] categorized
as largely religious in motivation--in 1995 almost half of
the identified groups, 26 out of 56, were classified as religiously
motivated--the majority of these espoused Islam as their guiding
force" (Bruce Hoffman of the RAND Corporation).
Iranian
and Afghan jihad Terrorism, year 1979: Two watershed
events occurred on this year. 1. The Iranian Islamic revolution
(where the Shah of Iran was overthrown and a fundamentalist
Islamic government was installed in Iran). 2. The Soviet
invasion of Afghanistan, which sparked the anti-Soviet mujahedeen
war. This war lasted for ten years, from 1979 to 1989. This
Afghan war spawned the meteoric birth and expansion of battle-hardened,
well-trained Islamic Arab militants. At first these militants
were fighting to free their Islamic Afghan brothers from Soviet
domination, and appeared to all outside observers as harmless,
merely fighting to free their Muslim Afghan brothers from
Soviet tyranny and domination. (The Afghan people are not
Arab, although they are Muslim, Islamic.) Volunteers from
all over the Arab Islamic world streamed into Afghanistan,
supported by conservative countries like Saudi Arabia. In
Yemen, the Riyadh-backed Islamic Front was established to
provide financial, logistical and training support for Yemeni
volunteers. A new group was making its presence known to
the Soviets in Afghanistan--the "Arab Afghans."
With the fall of the Soviet Union starting to take place in
1989, coupled to the timely introduction of the Stinger missile
being given to mujahedeen fighters by the U.S., the Soviets
were driven out of Afghanistan by the mujahedeen, comprised
now of a major new element, these "Arab Afghans", under the
"inspired" leadership of one Osama Bin Ladin.
Next
event: A very militant form of Islamic government--one
quite similar (but even more militant in its brutality) to
the Islamic government in Iran-took over in Afghanistan, the
Taliban. Osama Bin Ladin and his "Afghan Arabs" were instrumental
in forcing this Taliban government on the disunited and often
bickering tribes of the mujahedeen in Afghanistan. Now there
existed a pool of well-trained, battle-hardened Islamic militants
under the command of Osama Bin Ladin--more importantly--living
under the full governmental and diplomatic protection of the
new Taliban government of Afghanistan. These so-called Arab
Afghans have and are currently using their experience all
over the Muslim/Islamic world to support local insurgencies
in North Africa, Kashmir, Chechnya, China, Bosnia and the
Philippines.
Iran:
The radical Islamic government of Iran sponsored and continues
to sponsor the spread of radical Islam through terrorism,
specifically through the Iranian backed and Syrian supported
Hezbollah. It was the Hezbollah who pioneered the use of
suicide bombers in the Middle East. The Hezbollah were directly
linked to the 1983 bombing and deaths of 241 U.S. Marines
in Beirut, Lebanon, as well as multiple kidnappings of U.S.
and Western civilians and government officials. The Hezbollah
continues as one of the central sources of training and equipping
of secular, Shia and Sunni movements against Israel. Up until
very recently Iraq and Syria were heavily involved in support
of terrorist groups. Since 1989 religious Islamic extremists
have shown a willingness to strike targets outside the countries
they wish to subjugate.
Key
Radical Religious Groups
[descriptions
taken directly from the U.S. State Department publication
"Patterns of Global Terrorism, 2000"]
·
Hezbollah: Radical Shia
group formed in 1982 in Lebanon. Strongly anti-Western and
anti-Israeli. Closely allied with, and often directed by,
Iran but may have conducted operations that were not approved
by Tehran. Known or suspected to have been involved in numerous
anti-U.S. terrorist attacks, including the suicide truck bombing
of the U.S. Embassy and U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut in
October 1983 and the U.S. Embassy annex in Beirut in September
1984. Elements of the group were responsible for the kidnapping
and detention of U.S. and other Western hostages in Lebanon.
The group attacked the Israeli Embassy in Argentina in 1992
and is a suspect in the 1994 bombing of the Israeli cultural
center in Buenos Aires. Operates in the Bekaa Valley [guess
where Israeli intelligence suspects a lot of Saddam's weapons
of mass destruction are hidden--the Bekaa Valley!], the southern
suburbs of Beirut, and southern Lebanon. Has established
cells in Europe, Africa, South America, North America, and
Asia. Receives substantial amounts of financial, training,
weapons, explosives, political, diplomatic, and organizational
aid from Iran and Syria.
·
Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ-Al-Jihad
Group, Islamic Jihad): Egyptian group active since the
late 1970s. The EIJ is apparently split into two factions:
one led by Ayman al-Zawahiri-who currently is in Afghanistan
and is a key leader in the Usama bin Laden (UBL) network--and
Vanguards of Conquest (Talaa' al-Fateh) led by Ahmad Husayn
Agiza. Abbud al-Zumar, leader of the original Jihad, is imprisoned
in Egypt and recently joined the group's jailed spiritual
leader, Shaykh Umar Abd al-Rahman, in a call for a "peaceful
front." The group's traditional goal is the overthrow
of the Eyptian Government and creation of an Islamic state.
Given its involvement with UBL, EIJ is likely increasingly
willing to target U.S. interests. The group has threatened
to strike the U.S. for its jailing of Shaykh al-Rahman and
the arrests of EIJ cadres in Albania, Azerbaijan, and the
United Kingdom.
·
Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ):
The PIJ, emerging from radical Gazan Palestinians in the
1970s, is apparently a series of loosely affiliated factions
rather than a cohesive group. The PIJ focus is the destruction
of Israel and the creation of a Palestinian Islamic state.
Due to Washington's support of Israel, the PIJ has threatened
to strike American targets; the PIJ has not "specifically"
conducted attacks against U.S. interests; Arab regimes deemed
as un-Islamic are also threatened. The group has stated its
willingness to hit American targets in Jordan. PIJ cadres
reportedly receive funding from Tehran and logistical support
from Syria.
·
Islamic Resistance Movement
(HAMAS): Emerging from the Muslim Brotherhood during the
first Palestinian intifadah (1987), HAMAS has become the primary
anti-Israeli religious opposition in the occupied territories.
The group is mainly known for its use of suicide bombers and
is loosely organized, with centers in Gaza and certain areas
in the West Bank. HAMAS, while condemning American policies
favoring Israel, has not targeted the U.S. directly.
·
Islamic Gama'at, Egyptian al-Gaa'at
al-Islamiyya, IG
The
IG, begun in the 1970s, is the largest of the Egyptian militant
groups. Its core goal is the overthrow of the Cairo regime
and creation of an Islamic state. [emphasis mine] The
IG appears to be a more loosely organized entity than the
EIJ, and maintains a globally present external wing. IG leadership
signed Usama bin Ladin's February 1998 anti-U.S. fatwa but
has denied supporting UBL. Shaykh Umar Abd al-Rahman is al-Gama'at's
spiritual leader, and thus the U.S. has been threatened with
attack. From 1993 until the cease-fire, al-Gama'a launched
attacks on tourists in Egypt, most notably the attack in November
1997 at Luxor that killed 58 foreign tourists. Also claimed
responsibility for the attempt in June 1995 to assassinate
Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Has a worldwide presence, including Sudan, the United Kingdom,
Afghanistan, Austria, and Yemen. The Egyptian Government
believes Iran, Bin Laden, and Afghan militant groups support
the organization.
Key
Groups in the New Phase of Militant Islamic Terrorism
[descriptions
taken directly from the U.S. State Department publication
"Patterns of Global Terrorism, 2000"]
*Al-Qaeda
(The Base): Established by Usama Bin Ladin (UBL) circa
1990, Al Qaeda aims to coordinate a transnational mujahideen
network; stated goal is to "reestablish the Muslim State"
throughout the world via the overthrow of corrupt regimes
in the Islamic world and the removal of foreign presence--primarily
American and Israeli-from the Middle East. [emphasis
mine] UBL has issued three anti-U.S. fatwas encouraging Muslims
to take up arms against Washington's "imperialism." Al Qaeda
provides financial, manpower, transportation, and training
support to extremists worldwide. In February 1998 bin
Ladin issued a statement under the banner of "The World Islamic
Front for Jihad Against the Jews and Crusaders," saying it
was the duty of all Muslims to kill U.S. citizens, civilian
or military, and their allies. [emphasis mine] Allegedly
orchestrated the bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Nairobi,
Kenya and Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania, on August 7, 1998. Claims
to have been involved in the 1993 killing of U.S. servicemen
in Somalia ["Blackhawk Down"] and the December 1992 bombings
against U.S. troops in Aden, Yemen. Al Qaeda serves as the
core of a loose umbrella organization that includes members
of many Sunni Islamic extremist groups, including factions
of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ), the Gama'at al-Islamiyya
(IG), and the Harakat ul-Mujahidin (HUM). The group is a
prime suspect in the Sept. 11 attacks as well as the U.S.S.
Cole bombing.
*Armed
Islamic Group (GIA): Having initiated terrorist activities
in 1992 following the Algiers refusal to accept a democratically
elected Islamist government, the GIA has conducted multiple
mass killings of civilians and assassinations of Algerian
leaders. While present in areas such as Yemen, the GIA reportedly
does not target the U.S. directly. However, it is possible
that GIA splinter movements or personnel may become involved
in anti-U.S. action.
*
Aden-Abyan Islamic Army (AAIA): The Aden-Abyan Islamic
Army is allegedly affiliated to the Yemeni Islamic Jihad and
has been implicated in acts of violence with the stated goal
to "hoist the banner of jihad, and fight secularism in Yemen
and the Arab countries." Aden-Abyan Islamic Army leader Zein
al-Abideen al-Mehdar was executed for participating in the
December 1998 kidnapping of 16 Western tourists. Four of
the hostages were killed and another 13 freed when Yemeni
security forces attacked the place where the hostages were
being held. In March 1999 the group warned the U.S. and British
ambassadors in Yemen to leave immediately.
*
Harakat ul-Mujahidin (HUM): Formerly part of the Harakat
al-Ansar (HUA), the Pakistani-based HUM operates primarily
in Kashmir. Longtime leader of the group, Fazlur Rehman Khalil,
in mid-February stepped down; the popular Kashmir commander
and second-in-command, Farooq Kashmiri, assumed the reigns.
Khalil, who has been linked to Bin Ladin and signed his fatwa
in Bebruary 1998 calling for attacks on U.S. and Western interests,
assumed the position of HUM Secretary General. The HUM is
linked to the militant group al-Faran that kidnapped five
Western tourists in Kashmir in July 1995; one was killed in
August 1995 and the other four reportedly were killed in December
of the same year. Supporters are mostly Pakistanis and Kashmiris
and also include Afghans and Arab veterans of the Afghan war.
The HUM trains its militants in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
*
Jaish-e-Mohammed (Army of Mohammed): The Pakistani-based
Jaiash-e-Mohammed (JEM) has greatly expanded since Maulana
Masood Azhar, a former ultra fundamentalist Harakat ul-Ansar
(HUA) leader, formed the group in February 2000. The group's
aim is to unite Kashmir with Pakistan. It is politically
aligned with the radical, pro-Taliban, political party, Jamiat-i
Ulema-i Islam (JUI-F). The JEM maintains training camps in
Afghanistan [written previous to the overthrow the Taliban
and the installation of a free democratic Muslim government
in Afghanistan] Most of the JEM's cadre and material resources
have been drawn from the militant groups Harakat ul-Jihad
al-Islami (HUJI) and the Harakat ul-Mujahedin (HUM). The
JEM has close ties to Afghan Arabs and the Taliban. Usama
Bin Ladin is suspected of giving funding to the JEM. Group
by this name claimed responsibility for the USS Cole
attack.
*
Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LT) (Army of the Righteous): The LT
is the armed wing of the Pakistan-based religious organization,
Markaz-ud-Dawa-wal-Irshad (MDI)--a Sunni anti-U.S. missionary
organization formed in 1989. One of the three largest and
best trained groups fighting in Kashmir against India, it
is not connected to a political party. The LT leader is MDI
chief, Professor Hafiz Mohammed Saeed. Almost all LT cadres
are foreigners--mostly Pakistanis from seminaries across the
country and Afghan veterans of the Afghan wars. The LT trains
its militants in mobile training camps across Pakistan-administered
Kashmir and Afghanistan.
Fundamentalist
Islam: fundamentalist Islam calls for a return to
an ontological form of Islam that rejects modernity;
groups such as Al Qaeda and the Egyptian Islamic Jihad are
representative of fundamentalist Islam." [emphasis
mine]
Since 1989 religious Islamic extremists have shown a willingness
to strike outside the countries they wish to subjugate.
Now to put this into perspective with ongoing current
events, shifts in global nuclear powers, and finally, Bible
prophecy
This
new phenomenon of Islamic terrorism has many Bible scholars
scratching their heads, while others are thinking it all fits
into the general end-time scenario. It is the "others" who
are correct this time. Almost any day you can log onto Foxnews.com
and read about serious conflict going on in the Middle East--U.S.
Marines in a firefight in some Iraqi city, some Iraqi pipeline
blown up, some terrorist attack killing innocent American
or European civilians in Saudi Arabia (once considered a safe
place to live and work), Iran harboring and developing nuclear
weapons, Pakistan already possessing them (they're an Islamic
nation)--similar situation in North Korea--rumours of Saddam's
hidden weapons of mass destruction being hidden in the Bakaa
Valley of Syria. And then you have the never-ending blood-letting
of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict--which is very similar
to the 600-year old conflict which has simmered in the Balkans
where two religions, Muslims and Catholics have slaughtered
each other for centuries on end, with brief intermissions
along the way. What do all these conflicts have in
common? One answer, they're all over religion,
they're religious based conflicts. It's not about
oil or money. In the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, it's a
conflict between the people who believe in the Jewish-Christian
God of the Bible and the people who believe in Islam's god,
Allah. It's not just about terrorist's. In most fundamentalist
thinking Arab minds these terrorists are regarded as freedom
fighters for Allah, and they're fighting to install fundamental
dictatorial Islamic governments across the Arab-Muslim world,
which would include the nations ringing North Africa, the
Middle East and Turkey (you've just read information taken
from the State Department report on global terrorism, so you
know this is true). The governments they want to see installed
are like the fundamental Islamic government that's in Iran,
and what was the Talliban government in Afghanistan. To many
Arab minds, the Al Qaida are freedom fighters. But why are
they attacking the U.S. then? Why 9/11, the bombing of two
U.S. Embassies in central Africa, the bombing of the U.S.S.
Cole? [Lest we forget, log onto: Simply this, the United States
is closely allied with the one freedom-loving democracy in
existence in the Middle East--Israel. Now the United States
is trying to install a western type freedom-loving democracy
in the nation of Iraq, as well as having done so in Afghanistan,
two strongly Muslim countries of the Middle East. To the
average American this is a war against terrorism, one where
the terrorists of Al Qaida soundly delivered their Pearl Harbor
attack against America, and we've merely responded in kind.
But to the Islamic mind, this is far more, this is about advancing
Islam. It's also, if we look closer, a clash
between two civilizations, the western Judeo-Christian democracies
where freedom and individuality of the citizen are cherished,
and Islamic civilization based on a religion that--in
its expansionist mode--uses violence
to spread itself and its influence. If you look carefully
at what the major "export" of Iran is, it's not oil. Over
the past 20 years Iran has been exporting an extremist Islamic
form of government, exported via violent acts of terrorism.
Islamic terrorism has been spreading through the Sudan, and
many other North African countries, exported by this more
militant form of Islam coming from both Saudi Arabia and Iran.
But it has been coming out of Iran for the past 20 years,
slowly taking root as fundamentalist terror organizations
infiltrate these nations in North Africa and the Muslim world.
The Hezbollah is the major Iranian terrorist group, directly
funded out of Iran, who operates against the nation of Israel.
This form of Islam, supported by some very influential Saudi's
and spreading throughout Saudi Arabia at many levels, is causing
somewhat of a quandary for the Saudi government, as this form
of Islam seeks the overthrow of the Saudi kingdom itself.
The ultimate goal of making Afghanistan and Iraq into free
democracies is to put the activist Islamic government of Iran
in a sort of headlock--isolating, and hopefully cutting off
the source of this extremist form of Islam through terrorism.
The United States has already freed Afghanistan from its version
of extremist Islamic government, the Taliban, and installed
a free Muslim based democracy in that nation. So Iran is
somewhat panic stricken, seeing this two-sided democratic
head-lock coming its way (while its citizens clamor for democracy
from within Iran). Naturally, realizing this, the call for
"all true Islamic freedom fighters" has gone out--with orders
to report to Iraq and fight to the death for Allah and Islam.
The fanatical Islamic government of Iran must be pretty desperate
by now. It's a "them or us" mentality with no room for compromise
as far as they are concerned. Coupled to the Iranian fears,
is the remnants of all those 20 thousand Afghan Arab freedom
fighters, trained in Al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan, who are
being called into the fight by an Al-Qaeda leadership which
is licking its wounds. Estimated number of Afghan Arab "freedom
fighters" left, 18,000. What we are witnessing in the news
today is Islam in its expansionist mode--with
a very visionary President Bush trying desperately to shove
this "Islamic Genie" back into the bottle and cork it. What
happens if he (and we) doesn't succeed? Answer: History repeats
itself. Read on.
History
as a window to the future, Europe vs. Islam: Has this
scenario ever occurred before in history? And what was the
result, if it has? The answer is, yes, it has. In the 1100's
AD, the Muslim world through violence had conquered and installed
fundamental Islamic governments which spanned from North Africa
on the Atlantic Ocean side all the way to Egypt, throughout
the entire Middle East, and all the way to what is now Turkey,
and had advanced through the Balkans (that's why the Balkans
are part Catholic, part Muslim or Islamic). The Saracens
in Turkey were knocking on one of Europe's back doors in the
Balkans, and on Europe's other back door attacking southern
Spain from Morocco. These advances triggered a massive two-hundred
year blood-letting called the Crusades, which then led to
the Inquisitions of the Catholic church within Europe. Just
north of the Balkans, Vlad the Impaler stopped the Saracens
cold, in their tracks. Catholicism was enforced throughout
Europe by the Inquisitions, at first in fear of the sweep
of Muslim civilization, and then these Inquisitions degenerated
into going after anyone who wasn't a Catholic (Jews and Protestants,
mainly). This was above all else a massive clash of the western
so-called Christian and eastern Islamic civilizations. In
both cases, fear of the other civilization drove the atrocities
and warfare, designed originally to stop Islam at the borders
of Europe. Now yet again fundamental Islam is threatening
all the countries of North Africa, the Sudan,
and Middle East. It is knocking on one of Europe's
back doors, through that massive train bombing of Al Qaida
in Spain recently. And even with tightened security, more
is to come. Guerilla war is inherently easier to wage than
it is to counter. The United States, viewing this as a terrorist
threat, may hold these movements at bay or even reverse hard-won
gains made by the fundamental Islamic movement which is attempting
to install its form of governments across North Africa and
the Middle East, with it's next target--Europe.
And much focus is on the forthcoming re-election of President
Bush, which is critical in the efforts of the free democracies
of the world in forestalling the installation of Islamic dictatorships
around the Mediterranean world. But at best, if re-elected,
President Bush will only forestall Islamic intentions by another
four years. (If the extremists were smart, which they aren't,
thank heaven--they'd bury their weapons in the sand and wait
four years, lulling their "enemy" to sleep.) But what they
are doing instead, is providing extremely strong pressure
on the European governments to do something they've been dragging
their feet on, bringing about complete and total European
unity at the military-government level. For over sixty years
now Bible scholars have been looking in vain for the re-emergence
of some type of Holy Roman Empire style government that will
supposedly unite "ten nations" within the confines of the
old Roman Empire. Don't think it could happen? Think again,
nine such revivals have already occurred in Europe over the
past 1400 years, from 554AD to 1945. But most people never
connect the dots, history is such boring stuff, right? The
Bible in Revelation chapters 13 & 17, and in Daniel 2
& 7 predicted the rise of all these revivals, and
especially the rise of the one which has not yet occurred.
Europe--since the end of World War II--has been attempting
to unite, but sufficient incentive to fully unite has never
been there. It would seem the "incentive" has to be the threat
of their very existence, while the "protector" of the world's
free democracies looks politically inward. Historically you
can see how Europe handled the last Islamic threat to its
existence (1100-1300s AD). Europe has already achieved great
strides toward unity without the Islamic threat, a common
currency, a developing common military is also on the way
(including a common German-designed U-boat force being constructed
in the shipyards of three European nations http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/type_212/)--but
as always their efforts at achieving unity have stalled just
short of total unity. Why? Because achieving total unity
amongst separate longstanding sovereign democratic nations
is a very hard thing to achieve, especially when they do not
share common language or heritage, which none of them do (except
for Germany and Austria). Subsequently, all the past revivals
of the "Holy Roman Empire" had to be achieved militarily,
the two most recent being that of Napoleon and Hitler-Mussilini.
(Little known fact, Mussilini was crowned Holy Roman Emperor
in 1935 in a secret Vatican Concordat.)
What
conclusion can we draw from the history of Islam's 1st
major expansion in the 1100's? Conclusion-Islam's 1st
expansion made Europe & the Catholic church become
extremely militant.
Second
Major Threat to European Security--shifting and re-arming
global military powers: This perceived threat is currently
developing along the entire eastern border of Europe. Let's
take a look to see what is taking place in this arena.
1.
Growing Chinese threat: From an online source (BHP railroad
website, and other official Australian websites) I discovered
that massive amounts of iron ore are constantly being shipped
to Communist China from the Pilbara region of NW Australia.
I did a little more online sleuthing and discovered that the
Communist Chinese manufactured 181 million metric tons of
high grade steel in the year 2002, just about double the output
for the United States for that same year. I also discovered
that the Communist Chinese currently manufacture 20 percent
of the worlds commercial ships in modern state-of-the-art
computerized shipyards--yards which are fully capable of switching
over to the manufacture of naval vessels for the People's
Liberation Army-Navy (PLAN). Now I served in the US submarine
service, so I've always kept a weather eye on submarine development.
Considering that the submarine has provided the most deadly
and hard to detect platform for launching nuclear ICBMs, watching
international submarine development is key to seeing shifts
and buildups in nuclear strike capabilities of belligerent
nations and superpowers. So here's what I discovered. The
Chinese in 1987 commissioned a nuclear powered Fleet Ballistic
Missile submarine (FBM), classified by NATO as a Xia Class
FMB. This boat is equivalent to a modern Russian Delta III
class FBM, which is pretty scary. China only has one of these
subs, but has been using it as a test bed for developing and
testing better and better submerged launched ICBMs. They
have currently developed a three stage submerged launched
missile (SLBM) fully capable of delivering multiple warheads
per missile (MRVs) anywhere in the US (or Russia for that
matter, which is more to the point). It is of the more stable
solid propellant variety. Now the Chinese are working on
manufacturing a new class of Fleet Ballistic Missile submarines
to carry these missiles. So China has and continues to develop
itself into a global nuclear superpower. Next question, has
Russia shown any kind of military reaction to this growing
Chinese threat on their Siberian border?
To
see how far China has gone in their bid to become a nuclear
superpower--armed with an expanding fleet of modern Fleet
Ballistic Missile submarines armed with successfuly tested
two or three stage solid fuel submerged-launched ICBM's--and
a modern amphibious Army/Navy, click on http://www.gertzfile.com
and read what Washington Times writer Bill Gertz has written
about China. China has become a far more belligerant nation
than Vladimir's Russia. To look at some astounding
photo’s backing this up, CLICK ON http://www.jeffhead.com/redseadragon/planbuildup.htm
And the Chinese are exhibiting an attitude of racial superiority
not seen in the world since Nazi Germany and Tojo's Japan
in the late 1930's.
|
